Reese Witherspoon says 'Legally Blonde' wasn't allowed to film at Stanford University after school greenlit 'Insecure' to shoot on campus
- Reese Witherspoon shared that "Legally Blonde" wasn't allowed to movie at Stanford College.
- Witherspoon replied to an October 24 tweet by Issa Rae, who thanked Stanford for permitting "Insecure" to movie on location.
- Stanford has a long-standing filming coverage that pressured "Legally Blonde" to make use of Harvard as its setting as an alternative.
Reese Witherspoon lately shared that "Legally Blonde" was initially purported to be set on the campus of Stanford College after congratulating fellow alum, "Insecure" creator Issa Rae, for securing permission to movie on faculty grounds.
The revelation got here after Rae thanked Stanford for reversing their long-standing coverage in a tweet on October 24.
"Shout out to @Stanford for breaking their 'no filming' rule for us!" Rae wrote.
-Reese Witherspoon (@ReeseW) October 25, 2021
In response, Witherspoon tweeted, "That is main! Enjoyable reality: They might not allow us to movie Legally Blonde there. So we went to Harvard as an alternative."
"Additionally proud @Stanford alum right here .. Worry the Tree," she continued.
-Reese Witherspoon (@ReeseW) October 25, 2021
Stanford has a blanket policy towards utilizing its identify in business movies and filming on campus. The college carried out the rule as a result of "year-round campus exercise" to be able to shield "the privateness and security of its college students, school, and employees," the coverage states.
Nevertheless, even if the 2001 movie was set at Harvard College, campus scenes for "Legally Blonde" have been filmed on the College of Southern California, the College of California, Los Angeles, California Institute of Know-how, and Rose Metropolis Excessive Faculty, in accordance with "The Worldwide Guide to Movie Locations."
Whereas Harvard College doesn't permit business movie capturing on its campus, many function movies have used the varsity as their setting as a consequence of its lax insurance policies in the direction of utilizing its identify in films and tv exhibits, in response to a 2001 report by The Los Angeles Times.
No comments: